7/09/2012

The right time to enter California


As I'm sure you know by now we were able to get the final compromise on the high-speed rail financing bill in the legislature late last week. The passage of the bond funding will now allow the Central Valley projects to move forward as planned.  There could still be some delays, particularly in the southern sections, while they deal with completing the EIR and face potential lawsuits.

Along with the passage of the bond funds for the Central Valley HSR project there was $1.1 billion allocated to the urban areas for high-speed rail. That includes $600 million for electrification in the SF Bay area which will be matched by a similar amount from the local authorities. In addition,$500 million will be made available in the Los Angeles area, which again will have to be matched by local authorities, federal funds, or the private sector. Finally as you can see from the below chart about $750 million is also allocated for connectivity funds. These funds will be used by the local rail agencies in the amounts indicated below. In many cases these new funds will allow them to complete projects of much larger size where they have already been able to identify other funds. For example, in LA, the connectivity funds provide the final amounts needed for the regional connector.

In summary, in addition to the $7.9 billion authorized by the Legislature a minimum of $750 million will be provided to the local authorities and other funding will often be used to complete the projects. This will ultimately result in over $10 billion in funding for rail projects in CaliforniaThis does not count things like Desert Xpress which now awaits a decision from the federal government to move forward.  LA Metro is completing a study on the Palmdale Victorville section of that project which could add another $2-$3 billion in construction in that Corridor and when added to the $6.5 billion from DX would produce close to $10 billion of additional rail work.
Our team will be having some meetings in order to get a better sense of how they hope to allocate their funds. We will begin tracking all the funds and their local products. 


If your company is looking forward entering this market, we can provide the local support needed in order to achieve success. For more information or if you want to learn more about how we can be of help to you: gloperena@internationalsf.com 

7/08/2012

California approves High Speed Rail


California High-Speed Rail Authority Statement on Passage of SB 1029

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – California High-Speed Rail Authority Board Chair Dan Richard today issued the following statement regarding the Legislature’s passage of Senate Bill 1029 which appropriates federal grant funds and Prop 1A funds for California High-Speed Rail:

“Today’s vote to commence high-speed rail construction, like all major public policy decisions, is the result of hard work and collaborative effort.  Credit must go to Governor Brown whose courage and steadfast leadership has improved the High-Speed Rail Authority’s plans and operations,” said California High-Speed Rail Authority Chair Dan Richard.  “We also express deep gratitude to Assembly Speaker John Perez and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg for passing this measure through their houses. The Legislature’s action sets in motion a Statewide Rail Modernization Plan for California.  Not only will California be the first state in the nation to build a high-speed rail system to connect our urban centers, we will also modernize and improve rail systems at the local and regional level.  This plan will improve mobility for commuters and travelers alike, reduce emissions, and put thousands of people to work while enhancing our economic competitiveness,” said Richard.

4/15/2012

California HSR Revised Plan Passed - Abril 2012

High-Speed Rail Authority Board Passes Revised 2012 Business Plan

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. -- The California High-Speed Rail Authority Board today passed a 2012 revised business plan that will provide for high-speed rail service within a decade, connect the state’s major metropolitan areas, utilize existing rail infrastructure in northern and southern California and provide earlier statewide benefits to commuters in the Bay Area and Los Angeles at a cost of $68.4 billion.

"I am pleased to announce today that the High-Speed Rail Authority has taken a huge step forward toward making a coordinated statewide transportation network a viable reality,” said Authority Board Chair Dan Richard.

The business plan was adopted with an amendment committing the Authority to work with transportation agencies in Orange County to identify cost-effective ways to enable a one-seat ride to and from Anaheim. As part of the amendment, the Southern California Passenger Rail Planning Coalition will consider options for a connection that will cost less and be less intrusive than a full-build connection enabling the one-seat ride to Anaheim.

“We now stand poised to have an operational high-speed passenger rail system within ten years,” said Board Member Mike Rossi. “By working with community leaders throughout the state we will begin construction soon on a smarter, more cost-effective transportation option for all Californians that reflects the direction mandated by voters in 2008 with the passage of Proposition 1A.”

The Board unanimously approved a Memorandum of Understanding with Southern California transportation agencies and MPOs. This document outlines a shared commitment to advance the development of high-speed rail while providing funding for local early investment projects in Southern California that will improve rail service immediately. This agreement is designed to set the stage for construction to begin on needed Southern California infrastructure projects as early as next year.

In another unanimous decision, the Board approved a Memorandum of Understanding with Northern California transportation entities. This would electrify the popular Caltrain commuter train from San Jose to San Francisco. The MOU, which has been approved by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, calls for local and regional entities to provide funding for just over half the $1.5 billion agreement. The Authority would provide $706 billion from 2008 Prop 1A bond monies.

Lynn Schenk, vice chair of the Authority Board and longtime proponent of high-speed rail, lauded the voice of youth represented by pro-high-speed rail groups such as UC Merced student group "I Will Ride," whose founder spoke during the public comment period. Schenk said, “I am most encouraged by the energy and enthusiasm of young professionals, teens and twentysomethings who have made it clear that this is a project that will benefit their generation.”

Elected officials, advocacy groups and individuals overwhelmingly spoke in favor of the business plan at the meeting.

“I hope to see, in the near future, trains pulling through all the way from Los Angeles to the Central Valley, through Silicon Valley to San Francisco’s Transbay Terminal, which we believe to be the Grand Central Station of the West,” said San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee, speaking in favor of the business plan at the meeting.

“I appreciate that High-Speed Rail embraced the proposal for a blended system that Peninsula elected officials, namely Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, State Sen. Joe Simitian and Assemblyman Rich Gordon called for a year ago,” said Adrienne Tissier, who chairs the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Caltrain and the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors.

The business plan adopted Thursday was shaped by public feedback drawn from nearly 300 statewide meetings with landowners, elected officials and the public, as well as 250 public comments received over a two and a half month comment period.

California’s High-Speed Train Project   

The California High-Speed Rail Authority is developing a San Francisco Bay Area to Los Angeles and Anaheim high-speed rail system that will operate at speeds of up to 220 miles per hour. The full system will connect all of the state’s major urban centers, including Sacramento and San Diego. Initial infrastructure construction will begin in the Central Valley, the backbone of the system, in 2012. The project will generate 100,000 construction job-years of employment over the next five years and nearly one million economy-wide job-years over the life of the project. The project is being funded through voter-approved state bonds, federal funding grants, local funding, and public-private partnerships.

4/12/2012

Marcellus Shale - Opportunities ahead...


Great information for those looking for opportunities in different fields. From transportation to enegy, without forgetting about environmental.

Marcellus Shale
Information provided by Dave Yoxtheimer, Penn State University, Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research  (August 2011)

General Marcellus Shale Facts
·       The Marcellus Shale region covers 95,000 square miles which encompasses 6 states. Of these states, Pennsylvania covers the most area
·       The shale is found at 9,000 feet deep and is only 250 feet thick
·       500 Trillion cubic feet of gas is recoverable over its life
·       Marcellus Shale could supply current US demand for 20+ years
·       Natural gas is used for 50% of home heating currently
·       Natural gas is the cleanest burning fossil fuel
·       There are two dozen shale plays across the US
·       Marcellus Shale is the second largest gas play in the world, second only to the oil field in Iran/Qatar
·       Utica Shale can be found 2,000-3,000 feet below the Marcellus Shale
·       Dry Gas
o   More pure methane
o   Found more in eastern PA
o   Highest yield is in Bradford County; also located in Tioga and Susquehanna Counties
·       Wet gas
o   Contains methane, ethane, propane, butane
o   Costs more to refine but has more commodities available for individual sale, such as plastics
o   Found more in western PA
o   Washington, Green and Fayette counties have large supplies of wet gas
·       In the first 2 – 3 years of the well being tapped, approximately 50% of the gas is recovered
·       Permits take approximately 1 month
·       Transportation is a major expense

Marcellus Shale Drilling
·        3,600 wells drilled to date. Less than half of these are online and producing due to economics
·       1,600 Marcellus wells currently in operation
·       3,000 -4,000 wells per year drilled are predicted
·       Marcellus Shale pads
o   Generally require 6 acres to be cleared
o   Actual well pad is 3-4 acres for equipment and wells on one footprint
o   One pad can hold 6-12 wells, each accessing 2 square miles from one well pad
·       Extra casing and concrete is used closer to the top of the well to protect ground water area
·       Hydrochloric acid is used to clean the well bore to reduce friction in drilling
·       It takes approximately 6 months to build and drill the well

Water Used and Treatment in Marcellus Shale Drilling
·       Almost 2/3 of daily water use is for thermoelectric water
·       8 – 10 Million gallons of water is used each day for fracking
·       10-20% of water used in fracking returns to the surface
·       Flow back treatment options
o   Direct reuse
o   Onsite treatment with reuse
o   Offsite treatment with reuse
o   Offsite treatment and disposal
·       Chemical precipitation, evaporation and filtration are some technologies being used for treatment
·       Approximately 2/3 of the water that returns to the surface is treated, recycled and reused
·       Great opportunity lies with water treatment and varying technologies and sites
·       Pennsylvania does not permit deep underground injection; no disposal into deep wells.
·       May 2011- Governor Corbett mandated that water treatment facilities must properly and adequately treat the fracking water. As a result, several water treatment facilities across PA did not meet these new standards. Only four facilities did of the 20 that were previously in operation; three in the northeastern PA and only one in southwestern PA.
·       Eureka Resources Plant in Williamsport is the only PA plant that can discharge to a stream because of high level of treatment
·       Three other water treatment facilities in PA are permitted to treat Marcellus Shale fracking water and give it back to the industry for reuse
o   Tara Aqua (Williamsport)
o   Blosburg (Tioga county)
o   Reserved Environmental Services Plant (Westmoreland county)
·       2 Million gallons per day of treatment capacity at permanent treatment facility now. This is only 50% capacity
·       There are mobile treatment units available and in use in the field as an alternative to the four qualified permanent water treatment facilities located across the state
·       Mobile units for water treatment are loosely regulated by the state currently
·       Approximately 25-35 mobile units in the field now
·       Taking out metals in water treatment costs:
o   $0.10-$0.15 / gallon – taking out metals for reuse by industry
o   $0.25-$0.30 / gallon – talking out metals and treating the remaining water for return to streams
·       Disposal of fracking water
o   Deep injection sites in Ohio, which is below Marcellus Shale level
o   Sludge is dewatered and taken to landfills that can track radiation levels
·       Water management plan is part of the permitting process
·       Wastewater treatment plans are subcontracted as part of the plan. They also must have a plan (and usually another subcontractor) for disposal of water or sludge

Other opportunities
·       Cracker plant – converts gas to ethane to ethylene for plastics manufacturing
·       Steel making and refractory industries are growing as a result of wet gas
·       Subcontractors
o   Transportation of fracking water
o   Water treatment and new technologies
o   Sludge disposal

3/26/2012

California HSR - Project Update - March 2012

San Francisco to San Jose Section High Speed Train
Winter 2012 Project Update
March, 2012

The California High Speed Rail Program is the most significant infrastructure project undertaken in the United States since the interstate highway system. The California High-Speed Rail Authority continues to make key decisions on various aspects of this project from small business participation, environmental justice issues and revision of the business plan. Our goal is to keep you and other stakeholders informed of ongoing progress and developments. Your participation in this project is key to its success. We hope this update supports your continuing involvement in the development of the nation’s first high-speed rail system.

Why California is Pursuing High-Speed Rail
With the state’s population expected to grow to 60 million by 2050, California faces three choices regarding its transportation system: try to build more freeways and expand airports to meet the increased demands; do nothing; or develop a high-speed train system connecting our population centers, as many other countries around the world have successfully done. At a total cost about half of what it would take to provide the same capacity on new freeways and at expanded airports, high-speed rail delivers many other significant economic, social and environmental benefits.

Recent Statewide Project Activities
Construction Development Advances
The California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) has approved terms and conditions were issued with a Request for Proposal (RFP), a process that allows Design-Build teams to bid on construction of the first high-speed rail project in California. The RFP was issued within the last week.

Five design-build teams have been identified as “qualified” to submit bids on the first segment of the high-speed rail project in the Central Valley. These firms will now be allowed to submit proposals competing for contracts to build the backbone of the high-speed rail system in the Central Valley. Proposals will be scored on whether they meet strict guidelines for technical competence, deadline schedules, methods of operation and costs. The winning bid will include a CHSRA policy and goal that says 30 percent of the work will go to small businesses.

The “qualified” design-build teams are:

FIRM
Small   Business (SB) Contact
NON-SB   CONTACT
CALIFORNIA BACKBONE BUILDERS
Christopher Smith
Daniel Filer
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PARTNERS
Lynn Romano
Chuck Lines
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED VENTURES
Verenise   Di Salvi
Jeff Riley
DRAGADOS/FLATIRON/
SHIMMICK
Shannon Reid
Walter Quincy
TUTOR PERINI/ZACHRY/
PARSONS
Sarah Morris
Or
Mike Barge
Gerald Brown

Small and Disadvantaged Businesses are Encouraged to Seek HSR Subcontract Opportunities
The California High-Speed Rail Authority is encouraging Small and Disadvantaged Businesses to seek subcontract opportunities with the five design-build teams that have been short-listed through the Authority’s Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process.
These firms will now be allowed to submit proposals to the recently released Request for Proposals (RFP).
 “This is the time for small and disadvantaged businesses to really mobilize and talk to the qualified teams to partner up and find contract opportunities on this multi-billion dollar project,” said Tom Richards, Vice Chair of the California High-Speed Rail Authority Board. “With a goal of 30 percent for small business participation, we are very interested in seeing the benefits diverse small businesses bring to the make-up of the design/build teams that will bid on this project.”
Business Plan Update
On November 10, 2011 a draft updated Business Plan for the project was released that describes a phased approach to construction that will allow the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) to adapt to changing financial conditions as it moves forward, section by section. The new business plan introduces a “building block” implementation approach to connect the state’s major Northern California and Southern California population centers with high-speed trains, and updates cost estimates, ridership figures and funding expectations to reflect current economic realities. The Authority collected public comments on the Draft Business Plan through January 17, 2012. The Business Plan project team is currently incorporating the comments as appropriate into a final updated Business Plan, which will be brought to the Authority Board for adoption before it is submitted to the Legislature. For more information, visit the webpage (http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/Business_Plan_reports.aspx).  The Revised 2012 Business Plan will be released to the public in advance of the April 5, 2012 Authority Board meeting.
Partially Revised Bay Area to Central Valley Draft Program EIR
The Authority is circulating the Bay Area to Central Valley High-Speed Train (HST) Partially Revised Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PRDPEIR) in order to address the November 2011 Town of Atherton legal challenges and court rulings regarding the 2010 Bay Area to Central Valley High-Speed Train Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report. A public hearing was held on February 9, 2012, and comments were accepted through February 21, 2012. For more information, visit the webpage (http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/ba_cv_program_eir.aspx).

Authority Moves Forward on Agreement with Southern California Transportation Agencies 
The California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) Board of Directors voted during their March 1 meeting to support the development of a Memorandum of Understanding with Southern California transportation agencies that outlines a shared commitment to progress the development of high-speed rail while providing funding for local early investment projects in Southern California that will improve rail service immediately.

Agencies that have already approved the MOU include: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink).

Specifically, the Authority would identify $1 billion in Prop 1A or other funds that could be used for early investment projects along the high-speed rail corridors, as defined in the Authority’s Business Plan. Meanwhile, regional agencies would work with the Authority to find matching funds in order to improve existing railways and deliver the HSR system sooner to Southern California. The coordinated effort defines a new interagency partnership, promoting a cohesive rail system that will enhance connectivity.

San Francisco to San Jose Section

In the Bay Area, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) has taken the lead in developing a draft Memorandum of Understanding with Bay Area transportation agencies that outlines a similar commitment to Southern California to progress the development of high-speed rail while providing early investment projects primarily in the Caltrain corridor (San Jose-San Francisco). MTC is coordinating with Caltrain, VTA, SF MTA, BART, SFCTA, and the San Mateo Country Transportation Authority. This draft MOU will be presented to the Authority Board at an upcoming meeting.

Additionally, Caltrain continues to coordinate with its local stakeholder communities on how to implement the blended approach proposed by Congresswoman Eshoo, State Senator Joe Simitian and Assemblyman Rich Gordon. Under this approach, which the Authority has embraced, high speed trains would operate with Caltrain primarily on the existing two-track system from San Jose to San Francisco. Caltrain in a joint effort with the Authority and corridor stakeholders is working on defining a blended system that would accommodate Caltrain, high speed trains and freight trains.

FOR MORE INFORMATION, TO SCHEDULE A BRIEFING OR REQUEST MATERIALS
If you or your organization would like to request a briefing or have informational materials provided, please call or email the project outreach team via the contact information provided below.
PARA OBTENER MÁS INFORMACIÓN, PROGRAMAR UNA REUNIÓN INFORMATIVA O SOLICITAR MATERIALES
Si usted o su organización desea solicitar una reunión informativa o que se le entreguen materiales informativos por favor llamen o envíen un correo electrónico al equipo de enlace del proyecto por medio de la información de contacto proporcionada a continuación.
Llame: 888-365-0122
Correo electrónico: san.francisco_san.jose@hsr.ca.gov
查詢詳情,安排匯報,或索取材料
如果您或您的組織需要介紹或提供的信息資料,請致電或電郵項目外展隊,通過下面提供的信息聯繫。
電話:888-365-0122
ÑEÅ BIEÁT THEÂM CHI TIEÁT, LAÁY HEÏN ÑEÅ ÑÖÔÏC CHÆ DAÃN HOAËC YEÂU CAÀU TAØI LIEÄU
Neáu quyù vò hoaëc cô quan cuûa mình muoán yeâu caàu coù moät buoåi chæ daãn hoaëc xin ñöôïc cung caáp taøi lieäu, xin goïi hoaëc email cho nhoùm tieáp ngoaïi döï aùn qua thoâng tin ñöôïc neâu döôùi ñaây.
Goïi: 888-365-0122